Tag Archives: refereeing

The Renegade Ref says Flexibility is the Key but being inflexible is sometimes a great trait!

Sometimes I have to see and listen, then I have to allow the seeing and listening to percolate in my grey matter (brain) and then I have clear picture of what I want to say.

Now this is okay if you have time to see, listen and think – you do not have that time when you’re refereeing on a Saturday afternoon, so you have got to remember what worked last time and employ it next time the same situation occurs.

If another situation occurs you have to rely on the training you’ve been given, sometimes this training is given out of the refereeing arena.

Take the Muamba incident at Tottenham’s ground versus Bolton (his club).  He was fortunate that he had his heart challenge surrounded by a massive group of medics (who had training on how to deal with a heart problem) and also the two referees were Chris Foy and Howard Webb (both police officers who knew how to keep their cool under intense pressure!)

As an aside the player was lucky that an eminent consultant cardiologist was in the ground watching the game and the steward allowed him on the field!

Why do I wander off to the realms of a player who had a heart challenge on a premiership field?


At A&H we believe in challenging your beliefs about refereeing so you have to think about different aspects of the game and by thinking about those aspects you’ll have introduced to your grey matter different things that will stand you in good stead when you don your kit and whistle and referee a football match.

In other words we aim to give you some training that could help your refereeing.

Now if you think you know how to referee and close your mind to other ways to think then you are consigning yourself to stay refereeing at the level you’re currently at – of course if you’re FIFA then that’s okay, except that they hold excellent training sessions with all their referees regularly!

So when we at A&H ask you to jump in a “correct” or “expected” box please shout at us “No I’m flexible”.  Because getting into either box means you could miss out on some of the joys of refereeing.

Please when you see the training we put on don’t think that Jeff or Jamaal or Jordan is in the camp we are representing; in fact, all three of us are flexible officials who know that to be successful sometimes you have to be inflexible and other times you have to be so flexible that you can touch your toes backwards.

So as we create training – including webinars – please make time to watch and listen to make sure that you have tools to become a better referee (and sometimes that is because you take what we say with a large pinch of salt!)

Do you execute Law or Apply Law? Part 1

IFAB this summer published a new set of Laws which have been re-written so the world knows the Laws and they designed them to make our lives easier!
I’m all for an easier life but recently I had a lawyer sitting in one of my lectures and she said that the sentences stating that “a goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball when bouncing it on the ground or throwing it in the air” means that a goalkeeper can throw the ball 65 feet in the air and be considered to be in control.
The next sentence says: A goalkeeper cannot be challenged by an opponent when in control of the ball with the hands.
What would you do if the goalkeeper throws the ball that far in the air and is challenged by an opponent?
The reason I ask is a simple one: too many referees are stuck at Level 4 and I get told that “but the observer backed them”.
If you’re correct in Law of course the observer must back you, he cannot state incorrect Law. However, you have to ask “did the clubs back me or even understand what I was doing?
Thankfully I’ve never seen a goalkeeper throw the ball in the air to retain control, so it is safe to talk about it but the question you must ask (if you want to get on in the game as a referee) is: what do the clubs want?
In our example everybody would think the goalkeeper can be challenged fairly if throwing the ball 65 feet in the air, so if you give the goalkeeper a free kick and tell them that it is illegal to challenge the goalkeeper they will think you’re mad and punish you via your marks.
Don’t allow that – by all means give a foul on the goalkeeper and probably warn him that’s the last time “I’m getting you out of jail!”
Now you’ve applied Law correctly, you’ve not alienated the clubs and hopefully you’re on your way up. Of course, when you get on Match of the Day and they can refer to those Laws in the 6 hours between the match and the show being aired you may have to do it differently.
In the meantime, apply law throughout with a modicum of “what does the game expect?” rather than just executing Law.

The foul mouth player

Last Sunday afternoon I had arrived back from coaching referees at the Charlton Academy when I received a phone from an observer asking for advice.

He had just watched a L7 referee who had conveniently ignored 15 occurrences of the F word from a player at his teammates (I’m led to believe that the F word was the nicest word that he uttered!) and then after 85 minutes conveniently did nothing when this player lunged into a challenge.

Fortunately, the opponent saw the lunge coming and avoided any contact with our foul mouthed player.

Now I know some of you will say that the referee should have dismissed the player for his language so the challenge would never have happened.

I cannot argue with that logic.

Here’s the paradox – both of the teams appeared happy with the performance of our colleague, the L7 referee.

However, when you factor into the argument that his side were losing 10-0 you can begin to understand why he was berating his own side.

The question here is how do you deal with both situations and still maintain control and still keep your career moving forward?

First of all let’s deal with the bad language – rule number 1 is ‘don’t ignore it’ – as a referee who I worked with told me “if you allow a player to act in a certain way he will think it’s okay to continue to act that way.”

So nip it in the bud – now taking action could simply be stopping the game and warning the player, it could of course be stronger.

This action will upset the referees and observers out there who believe that bad language should be dealt by a red card every time, but we’re talking about having a feeling for the game and acknowledging foul language should be curtailed to the acceptance of all of the participants.

So if you ask the player to moderate what he/she’s saying as a first step you are showing an understanding towards the play and players.

If he/she says “but we’re all players here” you can quickly say “I have to also worry about the spectators but more importantly any members of the public who maybe in earshot.”

Let’s move onto the lunge challenge.  There is a misconception among footballers that if there is no contact there is no foul.  You and I know this to be wrong!

If you see a tackle that could endanger the safety of an opponent it is your duty to take action.

The Laws tell you that it must be a red card! If you’re refereeing very senior football the players cannot argue if you show a red card, however as you move down the ranks the players can think “no contact” means “no foul”.

Now you can educate them – and watch your marks head south – or you can educate them and keep your club marks heading upwards!


By telling the player that they could be shown a red card but because you didn’t make contact I’m ONLY showing you a yellow card.

Note I’m talking in colours of cards and I’m telling the player how lucky he is to only been cautioned not sent off!